{"id":1156,"date":"2018-05-08T03:33:52","date_gmt":"2018-05-08T03:33:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/people.utm.my\/bakri\/?p=1156"},"modified":"2018-05-08T03:33:52","modified_gmt":"2018-05-08T03:33:52","slug":"science-in-4ir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/people.utm.my\/bakri\/science-in-4ir\/","title":{"rendered":"Science in 4IR"},"content":{"rendered":"
I felt that there is a huge void in regard to the mainstream discussion on the 4th Industrial Revolution 4IR.<\/p>\n

I my opinion, the utility of science in accelerating 4IR or i rather call it as ‘Science 4.0’ has been left. To concur with, what is not science?<\/p>\n

At this stage, there were not much uplifting and inclusive discussion on the 4IR. Many of the ‘wannabe’ 4IR experts have considered digitization, automation, data-based outcomes and connectivity alike as the 4IR important items- which is true at the certain level.<\/p>\n

To grasp the idea of many novelties, my advise is to always refer to the primary source. Hence, i now revert back to the original notion of the 4IR by the man himself, Klaus Schwab.<\/p>\n

True to my believe, Klaus Schwab has never leave science domain in the discussion. Indeed, he has repeated the three connected 4IR thrusts-namely physical, digital and biological worlds for several times. Aptly, all are science-related!<\/p>\n

Based on my reading, the book is well-exploring the digital aspect of 4IR. Perhaps, that is the reason of the continuous and stack of discussion on this specific theme.<\/p>\n

Klaus Schwab is an engineer (and economist) by training, thus i believe he need more supply of information and time in navigating the other aspects or the science domain of 4IR.<\/p>\n

As put forward by Klaus Schwab, the discussion on the impact of 4IR to government and governance is worth of a separated book. So do with science.<\/p>\n

Here i am to explore the idea of Science 4.0 era.<\/span><\/div>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I felt that there is a huge void in regard to the mainstream discussion on the 4th Industrial Revolution 4IR. I my opinion, the utility of science in accelerating 4IR or i rather call it as ‘Science 4.0’ has been left. To concur with, what is not science? At this stage, there were not much […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15855,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/people.utm.my\/bakri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/people.utm.my\/bakri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/people.utm.my\/bakri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/people.utm.my\/bakri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15855"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/people.utm.my\/bakri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1156"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/people.utm.my\/bakri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1156\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/people.utm.my\/bakri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/people.utm.my\/bakri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/people.utm.my\/bakri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}