Research & Grant Information
International Grant
http://www.uniten.edu.my/research/irmc/Pages/International%20Grants.aspx
http://rimc.uum.edu.my/index.php/en/research/international-grants/185-international-grant-15022017
International Grant
http://www.uniten.edu.my/research/irmc/Pages/International%20Grants.aspx
http://rimc.uum.edu.my/index.php/en/research/international-grants/185-international-grant-15022017
Original Article from https://www.parentingscience.com/praise-and-intelligence.html
Years ago, Americans were reluctant to praise their kids’ intelligence.
Like many people around the world, Americans believed that fawning over children would make them arrogant or narcissistic.
But then something happened. American educators were seduced by the Self Esteem movement. They started promoting the idea that kids need flattery to succeed. Want your child to achieve? Tell him he is bright.
Decades later, the idea is still entrenched in the popular culture. Consider Blue’s Clues, the preschool show that ends each episode with a cheerleading session for kids:
“Hey, you know what? You’re really smart!“
It’s very well-intentioned. But it’s also wrong-headed.
Because it turns out that certain kinds of praise can backfire. In particular, telling kids they are smart can make them act dumb. And here is the evidence.
When you praise kids for their ability, it makes them focus on looking good—not on learning
Kids praised for their intelligence want to keep proving themselves by doing well.
This might sound good, but it’s actually counter-productive.
In a landmark series of experiments on American 5th graders, researchers Claudia Mueller and Carol Dweck found that kids behaved very differently depending on the kinds of praise they received.
Kids who were praised for their intelligence tended to avoid challenges. Instead, they preferred easy tasks. They were also more interested in their competitive standing–how they measured up relative to others–than they were in learning how to improve their future performance.
By contrast, kids who were praised for their effort showed the opposite trend. They preferred tasks that were challenging– tasks they would learn from. And kids praised for effort were more interested in learning new strategies for success than they were in finding out how other children had performed.
Kids differed in other respects, too. Compared to kids praised for their effort, kids who were accustomed to being praised for their ability were
And that’s not all. Kids praised for their intelligence were more likely to view their failures as evidence of low intelligence.
When you praise kids for their intelligence, they learn to view their failures as evidence of stupidity
In the experiments by Mueller and Dweck, kids were given moderately difficult problems to solve. When each kid was finished, he was told “Wow, you did really well on these problems. You got….a really high score” (Mueller and Dweck 2002).
In addition, each kid received one of three treatments. He was either
Next, kids were given a second set of problems—this time, very difficult ones—and kids were asked to explain why they performed poorly.
The kids who had been praised for their intelligence on previous tasks attributed more of their failure to a lack of intelligence.
But kids praised for their effort responded the same way as controls did—attributing their failure to a lack of effort (Meuller and Dweck 2002).
In other words, telling kids they are smart can make kids LESS likely to view themselves as intelligent.
By praising kids for being smart, we teach them that their performance is a definitive test of intelligence. Kids might enjoy the initial praise, but when they encounter difficult challenges later—as they must—the praise backfires.
Young children thrive on praise, but even they do better when you emphasize effort over ability
Some research suggests that praising intelligence can enhance the motivation of preschoolers (Henderlong 2000).
However, praising intelligence is NOT as effective as praising a child’s effort and choice of strategies (Henderlong 2000).
In one study, preschoolers were presented with two puzzles to solve and then given one of three types of feedback:
Next, kids were given a much tougher puzzle and they experienced failure.
When the preschoolers were offered a similar puzzle weeks later, those kids who had been praised showed more motivation than kids who had received only neutral feedback.
But the kids who had received “process” praise showed more motivation than the kids who had gotten “person praise” (Henderlong 2000).
Another experiment yielded similar results (Cimpian et al 2007). In this study, preschoolers watched a puppet show in which the protagonist drew a picture and was praised by a teacher.
Some preschoolers saw the protagonist receive generic praise about his ability (“You are a good drawer”).
Other preschoolers saw the protagonist receive praise only for that specific drawing (“You did a good job drawing”).
Then the protagonist made a mistake that the teacher commented on. How did the kids feel about the show?
The kids who’d watched the protagonist receive generic praise (“You are a good drawer”) were more upset about the subsequent mistakes. When asked if they would like to draw themselves, these kids answered no.
By contrast, the kids who had been exposed to the specific praise (“You did a good job drawing”) were more likely to show an interest in drawing.
So what’s the bottom line?
The right way to praise
Telling kids they are smart can be counterproductive, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t praise our kids. As mentioned above, even the “wrong” kind of praise can be more motivating than no praise at all. And it’s likely that the right sort of praise — process praise — gives kids an advantage.
In a study tracking American children from infancy to grade school, Elizabeth Gunderson and colleagues (2013) found that the higher the proportion of process praise kids got during early childhood, the more likely kids were to endorse “can do” attitudes when they were in the second or third grade.
What’s important, then, is to emphasize praise that makes kids feel resilient. The problem with telling kids that they are smart or talented is that kids become frightened of failure. They’ve been labeled and they don’t want to do anything to lose that label.
Moreover, kids praised for intelligence tend to believe that intelligence is something innate and unchangeable (Mueller and Dweck 1998). As a result, these kids are rendered helpless by failure. If you fail, you must not be smart. End of story.
If we keep these principles in mind, it becomes clear what kids of praise are the most helpful. Instead of telling your child she is smart or talented, try these alternatives.
Praising kids for effort (and not innate ability) may help them develop a better mindset for learning. For more information, see my article “Harmful beliefs: How a theory of intelligence can hamper your child’s ability to learn.”
And keep in mind other important guidelines
There are other pitfalls to avoid. For instance, even praise for effort can backfire under certain conditions. For more information, see this article on the most effective ways to praise kids.
And what about the flip side of praise — criticism?
Criticism can be just as tricky as praise to get right. Perhaps it’s even trickier because criticism is intrinsically negative.
But some intriguing experiments suggest a solution to the problem — one that is surprisingly simple. Check out my article “Correcting behavior: The magic words that help kids cope with mistakes.”
If you’d like to learn more about the many ways that praise can affect performance, I recommend professor Carol Dweck’s classic book, Mindset: The New Psychology of Success.
Cimpian A, Arce H-M C, Markham EM and Dweck CS. 2007. Subtle linguistic cues affect children’s motivation. Psychological Science: 18(4): 314-316.
Gunderson EA, Gripshover SJ, Romero C, Dweck CS, Goldin-Meadow S, and Levine SC. 2013. Parent praise to 1-3 year-olds predicts children’s motivational frameworks 5 years later. Child Development.
Henderlong J and Lepper MR. 2002. The effects of praise on children’s intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin 128(5): 774-795.
Mueller CM and Dweck CS. 1998. Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal for Personality and Social Psychology 75(1): 33-52
Some experience sharing on 3MT. From my own experience entering 3MT Competition at the university level in 2016 as well as others sharing from the internet. Hope it will be useful for everyone
This is probably THE most important thing you can possibly do. Everyone loves a good story, so ensure your presentation has one, include a beginning, middle and end. Ensure your last sentence focuses on the take home message. This not only makes it easy for the audience to follow, but a good story is also memorable.
How to do? Write your own story/3mt script yourself. Separate by section beginning/middle/end and write sentences separately with numbering list. Make sure your script fit on 1 sheet of papers. I find it easy to manage rather than you have a call card etc. But after all it depends on you.
Why: Easy to memorise/recall the number and what topics/sentences. Easy to plan your body language/expression/movement on stage/easy to track your timing.
During practise-I put time remark when I arrive at certain sentences. So, when minutes 2:55 seconds arrive I already at my last sentence and said my last word at minutes 2:59.
A good analogy helps. Your research will likely span several complex research areas. The real key to this is explaining them in a relatable way. make sure your analogy is something that everyone will be able to identify with, otherwise it’ll just end up complicating the matter further. Keep it simple
One of the most useful things I find, is looking at what other people have done before me. For the 3MT competition especially, it’s unlikely you’ve ever done anything like this before. Looking at how other people tackled the problem can be very helpful.
Don’t introduce yourself, don’t acknowledge your lab members or funding bodies and don’t show data! Your audience for this presentation wants to know the bigger picture. Explain what you’re doing, but leave out the detail. (More like telling your abstract but without technical information).
make it relevant to your audience, so that they will be bothered to listen in the first place.
Only include things that are relevant and ensure that any images you use are of good quality (don’t use images with watermarks – they are copyright protected). Don’t overcrowd your slide as this looks unprofessional and confusing, and avoid distractions like flashing lights or super brightly coloured backgrounds. Follow design guideline, colour scheme, focal point, etc.
but only so far as to ensure that you don’t wear anything distracting, otherwise people will focus on that instead of your talk. Choose your best and suitable outfit. Don’t overdo it and yet don’t look pale and boring. Stand by- ladies bring blazer because you might need to put in the head mic controller/battery in the pocket of your blazer. If not, you have to hold it, so it will limit your movement later.
Plan your movement and facial expression according to your script. Be aware of the perimeter set by the organiser. Normally they marked where you should stand and limit you can move. Keep in mind if your hands are flailing around, as this can distract your audience. Don’t stand behind the safety of your lectern staring into the computer, praying for the three minutes to pass! Get out and about, engage with your audience, look each of them in the eye (but don’t stare at just one person the whole talk – this is a pet hate of mine!). And smile! –That is why you need to rehearse in front of the mirror.
If you don’t sound like you’re interested in the topic, why would we be? Most people aren’t very confident when they do public speaking, but you need to get over yourself and fake it until you make it! It’s only 3 minutes of your life!
Humour can go down well in a presentation, and it can help make your story more memorable. However, be prepared for all outcomes. If your joke goes well allow a few seconds before continuing to let the laughter sink in. Equally be prepared for the audience to find things funny that you didn’t expect. And if your joke unfortunately does fall flat, have a back-up plan or brush past it onto the next part of your presentation. Even humour also you need to practise, but don’t too fake.
Practice by yourself, in front of the mirror as well as of other people, and especially people who do not know what your research is about. Practise in front of mirror to know how does your facial expression and movement looks like in front of people. Test few expressions until you find the one that suits well and appropriate for the audience. Rehearse the pronunciation of your speech too. Practise on timing setting too to make sure you cover everything in 3 minutes. Pick a practice partner, you can give each other advice. Multiple people in your research group entering? Great, dedicate a group meeting to presentation feedback. For this, you can never practice enough. Also record you practise video or audio. So, you can recheck and analyse yourself what should you do to improve the presentation.
Before your big moment, do something that relaxes you. Don’t go in stressed. Go for a run, eat lots of chocolate, just do something you enjoy. Come early and get familiar with the environment/ competition event. If possible have on quick test on set or you can just visualize how you will perform later. Be familiar with the equipment, especially if they are using collar mic. So, make sure you are ready and standby with your own items/gadgets to make you feel comfortable
A smile goes a long way, the audience will immediately click with you, and it will help you yourself feel more confident. Show enthusiasm for your research topic, the audience will feed off it and enjoy the whole experience a lot more. Even if the judges show their serious face, don’t bother and just smile. Find other nice, concern faces for some eye contacts. Eye contacts should be too long. Just a quick one throughout the area and repeat it again.
The three-minute time limit is very strict. Do not go over, even by a second. However, that doesn’t mean you should talk at a million miles an hour to get every tiny possible detail of your research project in. The audience just won’t follow. Instead, have a good story and tell it in good time. Plan some buffer time into your presentation, so that if you do stumble you know there are a few seconds of leeway. Remember you have practice and timing the presentation, so you know you already in safe hand.
There can only be one winner, and if it wasn’t you this time, that doesn’t mean your presentation wasn’t awesome. Heck, just having the guts to stand up there and try it is something on its own. If it wasn’t your day then don’t worry, there will always be other opportunities. The only way to improve presentation skills is to do more presentations. Your confidence and experience you gain from 3MT will be very useful in a future presentation.
Sure, the 3MT can be both stressful and nerve-wracking, but it is also a lot of fun! It is a great way to meet other researchers across the Uni, see what they’re up to, and share your own research. Enjoy the experience as much as possible and take every opportunity it throws your way
Great TedX Video on PhD Tips
2018 Reading List
Currently reading
Recent Comments