Dealing with incorrect valuation
Valuations are not an exact science, rather an educated interpretation of the characteristic of the property and market conditions at a given point in time. Often a valuer is challenged on how he/she arrived at the figure.
In most cases the point of difference will be the interpretation of market data. For example, on many occasions a vendor has based their own estimation of value based on the ‘asking prices’ in their neighbourhood. The valuer will only analyse actual sales of property where a transaction has actually occurred.
A common question received by valuers from property owners or prospective property owners is “What if I believe the bank’s valuation is incorrect?” A number of lenders, when extending mortgage funds, have drifted away from the use of full valuations and, in some cases, the figure they use may be based on a computer statistical model or a desktop assessment.
This is not a current market valuation, as described above. In fact our research indicates that there can be up to 10-20% of variance in what a valuer would assess the property to be worth based on a full inspection. Typically, lenders do this to save the borrower upfront costs which, on a $600,000 property, would equate to a saving of approximately $200 in valuer fees.
To determine this, ask your lender if a valuer actually inspected the property. Unless there is compelling market evidence of directly comparable sales that have not been picked up by the valuer’s research, then the valuer is unlikely to change his/her opinion of value. Given that most lenders expect the valuer to have inspected and completed their report within 48 hours of instruction, they may sometimes miss some vital evidence. If you are aware of a directly comparable property that has sold, supply it to your lender or the valuer at the time he/she inspects your property.