PhD & MPhil Titles

If you are interested in coming to UTM as a Ph.D / M/Phil students, and possibly working with me, here are some topics that I’m currently working with;

  1. Bio-inspired airfoil shapes for reduction Leading/Trailing edges noise.
  2. Energy Harvesting for powering IoT Devices using flow induced vibration.
  3. Aerodynamic Performance And Safety For A Proposed Malaysia High Speed
    Train Traveling Under Crosswinds
  4. Aerodynamics loading and Noise emissions from a high speed train
  5. Aeroacoustics refinement of a passenger car DrivAer for NVH improvement

Contact Me at researchsukri@gmail.com

How to extract raw data from OpenFOAM using sampleDict

We often need to take the data on a specific point. In OpenFOAM we can use sampleDict utility.

In the sampleDict file, we can add the following line for extracting data on a set of specific points.

curve // name of the file (can be any name)
{
type cloud; //type cloud for arbitrary ponits
axis xyz; // the points are scattred in xyz direction
points // list of points
(
(3.93 0.28 0.7897)
(5.93 0.28 1.2)
(7.93 0.28 2.2)
);
}

Sound from high-Reynolds number flow over bluff bodies

Purpose
– This paper aims to investigate the aerodynamic sound generated from flow over bluff bodies at a high Reynolds number. By taking circular and square cylinders as two representative geometries for the cross-section of bluff bodies, this study aims to clarify the difference in flow formation and sound generation between the two types of bluff bodies. Furthermore, the possibility for a downstream flat plate to be used as sound cancellation passive mechanism is also discussed in this study.

Design/methodology/approach
– Sound source from the near field is numerically solved by using the Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes equations. While for the sound at far-field, the compact sound theory of Curle’s analogy is used.

Findings
– Magnitude of the generated sound is dominant by the aerodynamic forcer fluctuations, i.e. lift and drag, where the lift fluctuation gives the strongest influence on the sound generation. The square cylinder emits 4.7 dB higher than the sound emitted from flow over the circular cylinder. This relates to the longer vortex formation length for the case of square cylinder that provides space for more vortex to dissipate. It is suggested that downstream flat plate is possible to be applied for a sound cancellation mechanism for the case of circular cylinder, but it would be more challenging for the case of square cylinder.

Practical implications
– This study include implications for the development of noise reduction study especially in high-speed vehicles such as the aircrafts and high-speed trains.

Originality/value
– This study identified that there is possible method for sound cancellation in flow over bluff body cases by using passive control method, even in flow at high Reynolds number.

http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/AEAT-06-2014-0086

email me (researchsukri[at]gmail.com) if you want the copy of the paper.

SnappyHexMesh: How to get a smooth mesh

This post explains briefly how can we get a smooth mesh when using the snappyHexMesh in OpenFOAM 2.0.

The main ingredient is the ‘surfaceFeatureExtract’ utility.

Here are the steps:

1- blockMesh: the BCs can be defined here, example: inlet and outlet patches.

2- extract the surface edge from the .stl file, example: tank.stl
command : “surfaceFeatureExtract -includedAngle 150 -writeObj constant/triSurface/tank.stl features”

this utiliy will create .eMesh file in /constant/triSurface/ : example tank.eMesh

3- in the snappyHexMeshDict, edge refinement is made by referring the eMesh file name, example: tank.eMesh.

4- run the snappyHexmesh utility.

Enjoy!

yPlus

This post is about how to calculate yPlus in OpenFOAM.

For RANS
1) with wall function; simply type ‘yPlusRAS’
2) without wall function;
i- type wallShearStress
ii- calculate manually: y+ = sqrt(wallShearStress/rho) * y/nu
y = height of the cell near to the wall
nu = kinematic viscosity.

For LES
1_ simply type ‘yPlusLES’

enjoy!

transformPoints

This post is for OpenFOAM user.

Most of the times, we need to import CAD drawing to OpenFOAM, especially for the complex geomtery. The dimension in the drawing somehow may changes after we imported into OpenFOAM.

with ‘transformPoints’ utilitiy, we can manipulate the coordinate of the imported file to our requirement. Refer to this site for complete explanation:

https://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/TransformPoints

Example: if we want to scale the CAD drawing to a factor of 0.01 in x and y directions:

>> tranformPoints -scale ‘(0.01 0.01 1)’

if the surface is not smooth (due to the sudden change in geometry) use surfaceFeatureExtractDict, e.g.: tutorials/mesh/snappyHexMesh/flange

or snapEdgeDict http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Contrib_snapEdge

 

/*——————————–*- C++ -*———————————-*\
| =========                 |                                                 |
| \\      /  F ield         | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox           |
|  \\    /   O peration     | Version:  1.7                                   |
|   \\  /    A nd           | Web:      http://www.OpenFOAM.org               |
|    \\/     M anipulation  |                                                 |
\*—————————————————————————*/
FoamFile
{
version     2.0;
format      ascii;
class       dictionary;
location    “constant”;
object      snapEdgeDict;
}

snapEdgeDict
{

/*snapPatches
(
);

snapZones
(
);*/

stlFileNames
(
square.stl
);

// only move those points that are closer to the features than the tolerance*| edge length |
tolerance 1.9;

// 1.0 = move the points to the edge, 0 = dont move the point
// under-relaxation works better with many iterations to capture corners
relaxation 0.1;

// number of iterations to move points towards edge
nIterations 15;

// set to yes if edges inside a patch should be included
// set to no if only the edges of the patch should be moved
// in general: set this to no to get optimal mapping of inlet/outlet patches
// this ensures that wall-faces and inlet/outlet-faces are mapped to correct positions
includeInterior yes;

// resolve all features with greater angle than this
featureAngle 90.0;

// do not snap edges with an angle greater than this to the feature line
excludeEdgeAngle 60;

// used when selecting between multiple edges to map to the same position
// if the angle is above this value
//     the choice will be based on which edge has the smallest angle to feature line
// otherwise
//     the choice will be based on which edge is closest
parallelAngle 50.0;

// allow for small overlap when fitting the edges to feature lines
fitFactor 1.0e-2;

}

enjoy!

Extract data from log file OpenFOAM

OpenFOAM version 2.3.0 has a new feature for its sixDoFRigidBodyMotion solver. There is no celldisplacement field in the time steps so we cannot use probe to extract data of the mesh displacement. But, if we like to extract the data, we can use extractData command.

Example, In the ./case/extractData

grep “Centre of mass” $1 | cut -d “:” -f 2 | cut -d ” ” -f 3 | tr -d “)” > cM
grep “Linear velocity” $1 | cut -d “:” -f 2 | cut -d ” ” -f 4 | tr -d “)” > lV
grep -e “^Time = ” $1 | cut -d ” ” -f 3 > times

paste times cM > t_vs_cm
paste times lV > t_vs_lv

rm cM lV times

After run the case, example: >> mpirun -np 2 pimpleDyMFoam -parallel > log &
Then type >> ./extractData log

You can find new files are created that contain you needed data.

enjoy!

Flow modelling and noise generation of interacting prisms.

Noise generation is a significant issue for High-Speed Trains (HSTs), and as speeds increase aerodynamically generated noise becomes the dominant noise source. In this article, the effect of nose shape, carriage separation and yaw angle on the aerodynamics and noise generation are analysed using two prisms, representing a HST model. The aerodynamics are modelled using Computation Fluid Dynamics (CFD), and the flow velocity and turbulence intensity in various positions in the wake are compared with experimental hotwire data measured in the Anechoic Wind Tunnel (AWT) at The University of Adelaide, with good agreement. Finally, acoustic beamforming images of the noise generated by the interacting prisms measured in the AWT are presented. The acoustic results show that a blunt nose tends to increase noise at lower frequencies significantly, while increasing prism separation tends to increase noise over most frequencies, but most significantly at midfrequencies, and increasing yaw angle increases noise across all frequencies. Beamforming results show that at lower frequencies, this noise tends to be generated at the leading and trailing edges, while at higher frequencies the noise tends to be generated in the carriage gap.

AIAA Aviation,16-20 June 2014, Atlanta, GA, 20th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference.

Paper: AIAA 2014-3287